BINTA M ROBINSON

• Review documents for responsiveness and privilege
• Determine if documents are significant for the case
• Use Relativity Software

• Reviewed documents for Responsiveness, confidentiality, and privilege
• Determined which documents were in need of machine translation from foreign language into english
• Performed quality review, wherein machine-translated documents were coded for responsiveness and privilege
• Performed quality review of other document reviewers' coding regarding tagging for foreign-language machine translations
• Used Relativity Software

• Reviewed documents for responsiveness, privilege and confidentiality
• Used Relativity Software
• Performed quality review of document reviewers' work regarding contract documents

• Reviewed documents under First Level Review for Responsiveness, Privilege, confidentiality, signficance and whether there is PII
• Performed Quality Assurance regarding other document reviewers' First Level Review work
• Used Relativity Software

• Performed Quality Assurance regarding Responsiveness and Privilege Determinations made by other document review attorneys
• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness and Privilege
• Determined if Client's Documents were important for the case
• Using Relativity Software
• Reviewed Contract Documents for responsiveness and privilege

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness and Privilege
• Determined if Client's Documents were important for the case
• Used Relativity Software
• Determined whether redaction needed for privilege or PII

• Sensitivity and Privilege Document Review
• Identified privileged documents for redaction/withholding
• Redacted privileged documents
• Identified noteworthy or sensitive documents for redaction/withholding
• Redacted noteworthy or sensitive documents
• Utilized Relativity Software

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness and Privilege
• Determined if Client's Documents are key for the case
• Recommended redactions for privilege, PII, and confidential material
• Used FTI Relativity Software
• Engaged in Offensive Review and applied relevant issue tags

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness and Privilege
• Determined if Client's Documents were important for the case
• Used Relativity Software
• Redacted PII
• Used Blackout Software for PII redactions in Excel

• Trained on Subject Matter of the Matter

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness and Privilege
• Determined if Documents were key to the Case
• Used Reveal Software for Document Review

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Relevance, Responsiveness and Privilege
• Determined if Client's Documents were important for the case
• Used Relativity Software

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness and Privilege
• Determined if Client's Documents were important for the case
• Used Relativity Software

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness, Relevance and Privilege
• Determined if Client's Documents were important for the case
• Used Relativity Software

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness, Relevance and Privilege
• Determined if Client's Documents were important or favorable for the case
• Used Relativity Software
• White Collar, DEA, and Pharmaceutical Investigation Experience

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness and Privilege
• Reviewed Documents for importance to the Case
• Reviewed Documents for Relevance to pertinent Issues in the Case
• Used Relativity Software

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness, Relevance and Privilege
• Determined if Documents were important or favorable
• Used Relativity Software
• White Collar, DEA, and Pharmaceutical Investigation Experience

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness and Privilege
• Determined whether Documents were "hot" documents that needed to be looked at further
• Contributed to Privilege Log
• Used Relativity Software

• Reviewed Documents for Litigation Support
• Used Relativity Software

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness, Relevance and Privilege
• Used Relativity Software

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness, Relevance and Privilege
• Contributed to Privilege Log
• Used Relativity Software
  

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness, Privilege, and Relevance
• Reviewed and determined if a document is a "key" document that is helpful or harmful to advancing the client's arguments in the case
• Used Relativity Software

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness and Privilege
• Reviewed and determined if a document is an "important" document that is helpful or harmful to advancing the client's arguments in the case
• Used Relativity Software

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness, Privilege, and Relevance
• Reviewed and determined if the document is a "key" document that is helpful or harmful to advancing the client's arguments in the case 
• Used Relativity Software

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness, Relevance and Privilege
• Contributed to Privilege Log
• Used Relativity Software

Hours Worked: Full Time

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness, Relevance and Privilege pursuant to an ITC action
• Intellectual Property (ITC) Patent Infringement Document Review
• Utilized Relativity Software
  

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness, Relevance and Privilege
• Reviewed and determined if the document is a "significant" document that is helpful or harmful to advancing the client's arguments in the case 
• Used Disco Software for the review

• Engaged in Antitrust Review
• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness, Relevance and Privilege
• Engaged in second level request review pursuant to an investigation by a US governmental agency and also a related review pursuant to an investigation by a foreign governmental agency
• Analyzed complex legal documents including emails, contracts, spreadsheets and other financial documents
• Determined which issues applied to documents and coded the documents accordingly
• Reviewed and determined if the document was a "hot" document that was helpful or harmful to advancing the client's arguments in the case
• Used Relativity Software

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness, Privilege and Redaction
• Used Relativity Software
• Engaged in First Level Review, Intellectual Property Patent Infringement Document Review
• Used Relativity Software

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness, Privilege and Redaction
• Used Relativity Software
• Engaged in First and Second Level Review
• Helped Construct Privilege Log
• Document Review pertaining to the Patents Field

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness and Privilege
• Used Relativity Software
• Pharmaceutical Patent Document Review pertaining to a Patent Infringement Action

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness, Confidentiality and Privilege
• Used Relativity Software for Document Review
• Inputted Data for a Privilege Log
• Intellectual Property Document Review pertaining to the Patents Field

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness and Privilege
• Used Relativity Software

Hours worked: Full Time

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness and Privilege
• Used Concordance Software for Document Review
• Pharmaceutical Patent Review

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Responsiveness, Privilege and Sensitivity
• Used Concordance Software for Document Review

• Reviewed Client's Documents for Privilege and Responsiveness
• Used Relativity Software for Document Review
• Intellectual Property Review

• Reviewed Client’s Documents for Privilege and Responsiveness
• Used Commonwealth Relativity Software for Document Review

• Reviewed Plaintiff's Documents for Privilege
• Used Relativity Software for Document Review

Core Duties:

• Organized Training Programs in United States Intellectual Property Law at the GIPA Campus in Alexandria, Virginia
• Organized speakers and delivered some presentations on United States Patent Examination Practice and United States Patent and Trademark Office Operations to visitors at the GIPA campus in Alexandria, Virginia

Hours worked: Full-time

• Salary: Approximately $123, 911 (2012)
• Possessed full authority to sign office actions, notice of allowances and other correspondences concerning patent applications
• Delivered presentation on U. S. Patent Examination Practice as a detailee (for several months) in the Global Intellectual Property Academy
• Reviewed patent applications to assess if they comply with basic format and legal rules and wrote final opinions with advice about the legal and technical requirements for the particular invention compared with earlier ones, during October 2011 through April 2012
• Determined the scope of protection claimed by the inventor, during October 2011 through April 2012
• Researched relevant technologies to compare similar prior inventions, during October 2011 through April 2012
• Recommended issuance of patent applications into United States Patents, during October 2011 through April 2012
• Conducted relevant prior art searches for pending applications to determine patentability of claimed inventions based upon their novelty over prior patents, patent applications, and non-patent literature, during October 2011 through April 2012
• Drafted written responses to attorneys and/or patent practitioners in response to filings and amendments of pending patent applications, during October 2011 through April 2012
• Performed both in-person and telephonic interviews with attorneys and/or patent practitioners to help expedite prosecution of patent applications towards potential issuance, during October 2011 through April 2012

• Reviewed patent applications to assess if they comply with basic format and legal rules and wrote final opinions with advice about the legal and technical requirements for the particular invention compared with earlier ones
• Determined the scope of protection claimed by the inventor
• Researched relevant technologies to compare similar prior inventions
• Recommended issuance of patent applications into United States Patents
• Conducted relevant prior art searches for pending applications to determine patentability of claimed inventions based upon their novelty over prior patents, patent applications, and non-patent literature
• Drafted written responses to attorneys and/or patent practitioners in response to filings and amendments of pending patent applications
• Performed both in-person and telephonic interviews with attorneys and/or patent practitioners to help expedite prosecution of patent applications towards potential issuance