Strategic Portfolio Development 20 years of advancing the public health and biodefense mission of the US Department of Health and Human services through identification and management of promising product development projects Skilled Communicator adept at initiating and leading collaborations and coalitions with relevant stakeholders. Experienced Negotiator in identifying common objectives and building consensus for both collaborative and contractual ventures. Innovator in discovering creative solutions within tight resource, policy, and other operational constraints. Evaluating and balancing status quo against future possibilities.
Responsible for oversight of portfolio funded at $95M
• Provide leadership, oversight, management, and scientific expertise in the planning and implementation of the peer review process, an essential component of the NIAID award process.
• Personally manage, as lead SRA, extramural scientists (as reviewers) for meetings to evaluate grant applications and contract proposals
• Recruitment of scientific expertise for participation in Internal Review Groups. Involved direct interaction through face to face meetings, phone conversations and emails with highly experienced extramural scientists and other professionals throughout the review process.
• Responsibility for the management and conduct of review meetings for evaluation of grants and contracts by serving as the Designated Federal Official. Facilitation of 5-40 professional level extramural panel members including scientists and other professionals with relevant expertise. Required detailed knowledge of policies and procedures for the review of grants and contracts through NIAID, NIH, DHHS, and the PHS.
• Participate in the development of research initiatives (both RFAs and RFPs) that involved interaction with Program and Grants or Contract staff.
• Administrative review, management, and preparation of grants and contracts for peer review. Required broad knowledge of biomedical and technological areas, including a detailed understanding of infectious disease, emerging biotechnologies, and immunological areas covered by research program areas of the grants and contracts. Required detailed understanding of the grants review and award policies and process for the Public Health Service and NIAID/NIH. Required detailed understanding of relevant RFAs and RFPs for the implementation of fair and unbiased reviews.
• Supervision of professional level staff. Administration of peer review process required oversight of grants clerk staff and other professional level Scientific Review Administrator (PhD level) staff for larger reviews.
Strategic Planning
undefined